Traceable
Link the brand document, archived page, packaging image or research source behind the claim.
Research intake
Contribute evidence
The useful contribution is not a code by itself—it is a reproducible claim with a source, date, market and known exceptions. Catalog additions and corrections can now be prepared as structured local evidence packages.
Phase IX / structured catalog research
Move from a blank template to an auditable intake folio.
The studio validates field support, checks likely duplicates, previews correction redlines, saves locally, and exports a portable JSON draft.Reproducible
Explain the exact character positions and test the rule against more than one known example.
Permission-aware
Only share images and documents you created or have permission to redistribute.
Catalog review queue
0
open public contributions. The queue stores evidence links and review state, never contributor contact information.
- 01
Submitted
Schema and URL check
- 02
Triage
Scope and duplicate check
- 03
Evidence
Field-by-field source review
- 04
Publish
Audit and catalog version
Useful evidence
- • Official brand or manufacturer documentation
- • Dated packaging photographs with market information
- • Multiple known codes demonstrating the same rule
- • Archived sources showing historical formats
- • Authorized-retailer listings from the brand itself
Not sufficient alone
- • “Mine looks like this” without a source
- • Marketplace seller claims
- • AI-generated explanations
- • A single code with no purchase context
- • Cropped images with unknown ownership
Evidence template
Submit the evidence package
Public submission intake is not configured yet. Copy and save the template; the site should not claim to accept submissions until an HTTPS intake URL is configured.